Nuclear Weapons

For all the none biking stuff. Say hello, chew the fat or flame the forum.
User avatar
Kwacky
Posts: 39401
Joined: 21 Oct 2013, 21:52
Your Bike: Brutale 800RR, 1000SX Ninja
Location: Brum
Has thanked: 4412 times
Been thanked: 8516 times

Nuclear Weapons

Post by Kwacky »

We don't need them.

Discuss.
User avatar
Blade
Posts: 18772
Joined: 14 Mar 2014, 18:43
Your Bike: Kawasaki ZX10R
Location: North West
Has thanked: 3134 times
Been thanked: 3767 times

Re: Nuclear Weapons

Post by Blade »

We need them. They are deterrent that stops armageddon.
User avatar
duke63
Posts: 15560
Joined: 22 Oct 2013, 07:34
Your Bike: Ducati 748/853 & Triumph Street Triple 765RS
Location: Staffordshire
Has thanked: 4231 times
Been thanked: 4152 times

Re: Nuclear Weapons

Post by duke63 »

Spending billions worldwide on something that would most likely end humanity for good were anyone stupid enough to actually use them.

It’s the classic example of how ridiculous we have allowed the rulers of the world to disappear up their own egos.

Just imagine what good could be done with that money.

I have no doubt my name and details are kept in some mysterious folder at GCHQ due to my membership of CND. In fact I am quite proud of it.
User avatar
Cav
Posts: 8098
Joined: 27 Oct 2015, 12:00
Your Bike: 2009 ZX6R
Has thanked: 1089 times
Been thanked: 2301 times

Re: Nuclear Weapons

Post by Cav »

Like guns in America, once you have them you can't go back. For that reason 1 country from every group of allies needs them.

Personally I hate that they exist. I like Nuclear as I do believe it's clean energy but not for weapons.
User avatar
duke63
Posts: 15560
Joined: 22 Oct 2013, 07:34
Your Bike: Ducati 748/853 & Triumph Street Triple 765RS
Location: Staffordshire
Has thanked: 4231 times
Been thanked: 4152 times

Re: Nuclear Weapons

Post by duke63 »

The fact they exist means that one day, one leader or one terrorist somewhere will eventually decide he is going to try one out.
User avatar
Kwacky
Posts: 39401
Joined: 21 Oct 2013, 21:52
Your Bike: Brutale 800RR, 1000SX Ninja
Location: Brum
Has thanked: 4412 times
Been thanked: 8516 times

Re: Nuclear Weapons

Post by Kwacky »

They will be the cause of Armageddon.

Only a few countries have nukes. Yet few countries have had peace since the last nukes used since 1945.

Nukes offer nothing but pointless retaliation.
User avatar
Blade
Posts: 18772
Joined: 14 Mar 2014, 18:43
Your Bike: Kawasaki ZX10R
Location: North West
Has thanked: 3134 times
Been thanked: 3767 times

Re: Nuclear Weapons

Post by Blade »

They have forced superpowers into small scale proxy wars instead of all out global conflict as their deterrent works.

They will never stop all war, but imo their deterrent prevents their suicidal use and the armageddon of a 3rd global war. As the history off the last 75 years testifys.
User avatar
Cav
Posts: 8098
Joined: 27 Oct 2015, 12:00
Your Bike: 2009 ZX6R
Has thanked: 1089 times
Been thanked: 2301 times

Re: Nuclear Weapons

Post by Cav »

Interesting fact.. The USA has only not been involved in a war for 1 year since it's formation.
User avatar
D41
Posts: 13389
Joined: 22 Sep 2014, 11:36
Your Bike: Triumph Daytona 650.
Has thanked: 4372 times
Been thanked: 1162 times

Re: Nuclear Weapons

Post by D41 »

Perhaps, but "involved in a war" vs. "being in a state of war" are two very different animals. And it's been more than 1 year....something like 220 years out of 238, or sommit like that, so 18 years without a war...not exactly something to write home about either, but very different from a mere 12 months.
Historians will typically tout things like 'The Cold War' too, which was not an armed conflict in any conventional sense.
User avatar
Cav
Posts: 8098
Joined: 27 Oct 2015, 12:00
Your Bike: 2009 ZX6R
Has thanked: 1089 times
Been thanked: 2301 times

Re: Nuclear Weapons

Post by Cav »

Ah.. maybe it was since the first world war then. Balls, can't remember the fact now so I guess that makes it a maybe.
User avatar
D41
Posts: 13389
Joined: 22 Sep 2014, 11:36
Your Bike: Triumph Daytona 650.
Has thanked: 4372 times
Been thanked: 1162 times

Re: Nuclear Weapons

Post by D41 »

That might make more sense, as the US pretty much kept to itself...or at least had a markedly smaller sphere of influence until it entered WW1. Fairly isolated nation until then, in fact....at least in that aspect.
User avatar
Kwacky
Posts: 39401
Joined: 21 Oct 2013, 21:52
Your Bike: Brutale 800RR, 1000SX Ninja
Location: Brum
Has thanked: 4412 times
Been thanked: 8516 times

Re: Nuclear Weapons

Post by Kwacky »

There are two stats.

It's a few days not involved in an overseas conflict, not "at war" since independence.

USA has had 17 years of peace, IE not at war, since independence.
User avatar
duke63
Posts: 15560
Joined: 22 Oct 2013, 07:34
Your Bike: Ducati 748/853 & Triumph Street Triple 765RS
Location: Staffordshire
Has thanked: 4231 times
Been thanked: 4152 times

Re: Nuclear Weapons

Post by duke63 »

I’m sure good old Kanye will stop it.


Imagine being Trump’s stooge. Muppet.
User avatar
Jack
Posts: 2629
Joined: 11 Mar 2014, 21:49
Your Bike:
Has thanked: 1396 times
Been thanked: 1636 times
Contact:

Re: Nuclear Weapons

Post by Jack »

the very fact that they have been invented means we must have them as a deterrent , even if we destroyed every current nuke the plans , materials and expertise exists which means that somebody somewhere will build another one . It would however be a massive bonus for the nuclear power industry ( if we destroyed every current nuke ) as all that enriched uranium and plutonium currently sat doing nothing in warheads would become available fuel , and it wouldn't need enriching which makes it cheaper and cleaner than mining and enriching new fuel sources.
User avatar
StMarks
Posts: 4731
Joined: 17 Mar 2014, 21:55
Your Bike: Daytona 675 graphite
Location: East Riding of Yorkshire
Has thanked: 973 times
Been thanked: 1370 times

Re: Nuclear Weapons

Post by StMarks »

Jack wrote:the very fact that they have been invented means we must have them as a deterrent , even if we destroyed every current nuke the plans , materials and expertise exists which means that somebody somewhere will build another one . It would however be a massive bonus for the nuclear power industry ( if we destroyed every current nuke ) as all that enriched uranium and plutonium currently sat doing nothing in warheads would become available fuel , and it wouldn't need enriching which makes it cheaper and cleaner than mining and enriching new fuel sources.
This ^

Weapons that have the capability of destroying all life on our planet should never have been created, and their existence/potential utterly terrifies me.
Nonetheless they do exist, and you can't undo what has been done.

Perhaps the Thread's question should really be "Nuclear Weapons, should the UK have them".?
User avatar
duke63
Posts: 15560
Joined: 22 Oct 2013, 07:34
Your Bike: Ducati 748/853 & Triumph Street Triple 765RS
Location: Staffordshire
Has thanked: 4231 times
Been thanked: 4152 times

Re: Nuclear Weapons

Post by duke63 »

You only have to read how many times nuclear warheads have nearly been used in cases of false alarm to know that eventually it will happen.

It’s always a last resort but at some point some idiot will want to go down in history as the leader who defended his Nation to the death or got his retribution in first. Had Hitler had the capability, would he would have used it from his Berlin bunker in his final days?
User avatar
D41
Posts: 13389
Joined: 22 Sep 2014, 11:36
Your Bike: Triumph Daytona 650.
Has thanked: 4372 times
Been thanked: 1162 times

Re: Nuclear Weapons

Post by D41 »

Apparently since 1987, uranium that has been declared as surplus to US military needs, and surplus to the needs of Russia, along with other former countries/member states of the USSR, has been diverted specifically for civilian use....the vast majority of which goes into the power generation business. The original agreement was updated in 1991, and then once more in 1999.
User avatar
Blade
Posts: 18772
Joined: 14 Mar 2014, 18:43
Your Bike: Kawasaki ZX10R
Location: North West
Has thanked: 3134 times
Been thanked: 3767 times

Re: Nuclear Weapons

Post by Blade »

duke63 wrote:You only have to read how many times nuclear warheads have nearly been used in cases of false alarm to know that eventually it will happen.

It’s always a last resort but at some point some idiot will want to go down in history as the leader who defended his Nation to the death or got his retribution in first. Had Hitler had the capability, would he would have used it from his Berlin bunker in his final days?
Chicken before the egg. The fact we have a nuclear deterrent will stop a global war from starting. No dictator will ever sweep across the globe again, conquering multiple countries by force, the nuclear deterrent stops this, thats the point.
User avatar
D41
Posts: 13389
Joined: 22 Sep 2014, 11:36
Your Bike: Triumph Daytona 650.
Has thanked: 4372 times
Been thanked: 1162 times

Re: Nuclear Weapons

Post by D41 »

duke63 wrote: Had Hitler had the capability, would he would have used it from his Berlin bunker in his final days?

It's a purely hypothetical question though, isn't it? The German "nuclear program" (for wont of a better term) was very much in it's infancy at the start of WW2, and Hitler, in his infinite wisdom, had the younger scientists conscripted into the Wehrmacht, or they fled the country, or were imprisoned for being Jewish, or made political prisoners of the Reich, etc.

I don't know if he would have used it or not, but realistically it was never even a remote possibility.
User avatar
Kwacky
Posts: 39401
Joined: 21 Oct 2013, 21:52
Your Bike: Brutale 800RR, 1000SX Ninja
Location: Brum
Has thanked: 4412 times
Been thanked: 8516 times

Re: Nuclear Weapons

Post by Kwacky »

Hitler would have used it. He was a nut job.
Post Reply