Defending the indefensible
-
Kwacky
- Posts: 39399
- Joined: 21 Oct 2013, 21:52
- Your Bike: Brutale 800RR, 1000SX Ninja
- Location: Brum
- Has thanked: 4412 times
- Been thanked: 8516 times
-
Monty
- Posts: 6769
- Joined: 12 Mar 2014, 07:59
- Your Bike: KTM 690 SMC R
- Location: Peak District
- Has thanked: 2163 times
- Been thanked: 2497 times
Re: Defending the indefensible
Ten quid says it rhymes with Fail, and bears some relation to the number 365
Monty™© MCMLXXII
-
D41
- Posts: 13389
- Joined: 22 Sep 2014, 11:36
- Your Bike: Triumph Daytona 650.
- Has thanked: 4372 times
- Been thanked: 1162 times
-
duke63
- Posts: 15560
- Joined: 22 Oct 2013, 07:34
- Your Bike: Ducati 748/853 & Triumph Street Triple 765RS
- Location: Staffordshire
- Has thanked: 4231 times
- Been thanked: 4152 times
Re: Defending the indefensible
I think the Daily Fail team need to go on a child safeguarding course and learn some lessons about grooming etc.
Unbelievable that a daily newspaper could write such shite these days.
Unbelievable that a daily newspaper could write such shite these days.
-
Frankie
- Posts: 3962
- Joined: 11 Mar 2014, 21:37
- Your Bike: Fast Ones, and dirty ones
- Has thanked: 750 times
- Been thanked: 1491 times
Re: Defending the indefensible
Sounds like an editor trying to justify something they might have done. Time for the other papers to do some digging.
