Kwacky wrote:My lad has just been sent home to self isolate for 14 days. Someone in his class has tested positive for it.
Best of luck...
What does that mean for your daughter? Obviously she has to stay home but does she now need to test and a positive result would mean her year group would be sent home to isolate?
Here in Aussie at least, when I was self isolating at home post work trips, self isolation meant isolation from people within the house as well. Separate bathroom, mask on if in same room, not preparing meals for others etc.
So it was deemed the risk to others in the house low, so they weren’t restricted.
Not that I did any of that....
Happiness is not a destination. It is a way of life.
It seems like that would be when it would be the hardest, because you don't have a choice about being around people at home.
I've no idea how that's possible/practical, TBH.
D41 wrote:It seems like that would be when it would be the hardest, because you don't have a choice about being around people at home.
I've no idea how that's possible/practical, TBH.
I knew I was absolutely no risk to people in my household, tested before I went offshore, health monitored every day offshore and tested on my way home. So inside my home I lived as normal.
My friend that got Covid (and caused my hotel quarantine stint) was living with her elderly parents in a single bathroom house. She wore a mask outside her room which she only left when absolutely necessary, sanitised the bathroom and kitchen after each use. She recovered fine and her parents were never infected. So it is quite possible and effective if done properly.
Happiness is not a destination. It is a way of life.
That’s bloody horrific, blanket DNR orders placed on groups without their knowledge or consent, seemingly because someone has decided that their lives aren’t as important than others.
That’s absolutely criminal behaviour imo.
Happiness is not a destination. It is a way of life.
Kwacky wrote:I can understand if a doctor makes a call for a patient, because that's their job. They've got the information they need in front of them.
But a blanket order? That's criminal.
Thats horrendous. I know they were under extreme pressure, but i'd like to know who made that decision - it must have been a directive.