Page 18 of 20

Re: In, out or shake it all about?

Posted: 24 Jun 2016, 07:46
by duke63
Britain is about to get to be a very expensive place to live. :(

Re: In, out or shake it all about?

Posted: 24 Jun 2016, 07:50
by C00kiemonster
duke63 wrote:Britain is about to get to be a very expensive place to live. :(
France got expensive overnight :(

Re: In, out or shake it all about?

Posted: 24 Jun 2016, 07:52
by Perkles
I bet Farage is wetting his pants

Re: In, out or shake it all about?

Posted: 24 Jun 2016, 09:03
by Kwacky
Farage has already admitted it was wrong to say that the money we send to the EU will go to the NHS

What a surprise, he lied.

Re: In, out or shake it all about?

Posted: 24 Jun 2016, 09:40
by Jack
usual panic and pandemonium when things change , however NOTHING has changed , we have said we would no longer like to be a member of the EU but that could take years to arrange , or the referendum could be completely ignored as the GRexit vote was ignored in Greece , just because the masses have spoken doesn't mean the elites will listen or act .

Re: In, out or shake it all about?

Posted: 24 Jun 2016, 11:52
by Kwacky
You can laugh and joke about the outcome as much as you like.

There's a bloke at work wearing shorts

THAT WOULDN'T HAVE HAPPENED BEFORE YESTERDAY

Re: In, out or shake it all about?

Posted: 24 Jun 2016, 12:02
by Blade
Kwacky wrote:Farage has already admitted it was wrong to say that the money we send to the EU will go to the NHS

What a surprise, he lied.
Did he actually say specifically the 350 million a week would be ploughed into the NHS or is it spin ?

Genuine question. My understanding was it was stated as a suggestion to give an idea of the scale of money we were paying into the EU not a specific policy.

Re: In, out or shake it all about?

Posted: 24 Jun 2016, 12:04
by Kwacky
It was on the side of the Leave battle bus :D

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06 ... a-mistake/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Nigel Farage has admitted that it was a "mistake" to promise that £350million a week would be spent on the NHS if the UK backed a Brexit vote.

Re: In, out or shake it all about?

Posted: 24 Jun 2016, 12:05
by Blade
Taken from the vote leave website

Over the past decade Britain paid over £150 billion to the EU budget. We send about £350 million to Brussels every week. This is about half the English schools budget, four times the Scottish schools budget, four times the science budget, and about 60 times what we spend on the NHS cancer drugs fund.

If we vote to ‘remain’, it is a vote for the permanent payment to Brussels of all this money. It will get worse. UK taxpayers will be paying for the huge bills caused by the euro’s crisis. All this money could be better spent on the NHS, schools, and fundamental science research.

Re: In, out or shake it all about?

Posted: 24 Jun 2016, 12:07
by Blade
Kwacky wrote:It was on the side of the Leave battle bus :D

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06 ... a-mistake/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Nigel Farage has admitted that it was a "mistake" to promise that £350million a week would be spent on the NHS if the UK backed a Brexit vote.
I saw that on GMTV this morning and I was surprised Farage said it was a mistake as I honestly didn't think that comment was said as literally as some people are spinning it.

Re: In, out or shake it all about?

Posted: 24 Jun 2016, 13:34
by Rossgo
Blade wrote:
Kwacky wrote:It was on the side of the Leave battle bus :D

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06 ... a-mistake/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Nigel Farage has admitted that it was a "mistake" to promise that £350million a week would be spent on the NHS if the UK backed a Brexit vote.
I saw that on GMTV this morning and I was surprised Farage said it was a mistake as I honestly didn't think that comment was said as literally as some people are spinning it.
It's the media in my opinion mate. We talked about this at work. People have spun it around...why do the media want to make people angry? It was clearly meant for the money to go on other things not just NHS. He has done nothing wrong in my opinion in this situation.

Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk

Re: In, out or shake it all about?

Posted: 24 Jun 2016, 13:41
by Monty
(facepalm)

Re: In, out or shake it all about?

Posted: 24 Jun 2016, 13:52
by Kwacky
Rossgo wrote:
It's the media in my opinion mate. We talked about this at work. People have spun it around...why do the media want to make people angry? It was clearly meant for the money to go on other things not just NHS. He has done nothing wrong in my opinion in this situation.
If he didn't say it why did he apologise for it?

Re: In, out or shake it all about?

Posted: 24 Jun 2016, 13:58
by Blade
I honestly don't know Kwacky but in fairness he did say in that GMTV video before he said it was a mistake that he hadn't said it so maybe he was commenting for others.

People have claimed it was written on the campaign bus but I think there seeing what they want to see.

[img]https://www.google.com/search?q=vote+le ... cFdXR3M%3A
[/img]

Re: In, out or shake it all about?

Posted: 24 Jun 2016, 14:08
by Kwacky
Morgan Stanley looks to move 2,000 London staff

Posted at
13:45




BBC business reporter Joe Lynam reports...

Sources within Morgan Stanley say it has already begun the process of moving about 2,000 of its London-based investment banking staff to Dublin or Frankfurt. And it has a taskforce in place.

The jobs which would be moved from the UK would be in euro clearing but also other investment banking functions and senior management.

The American investment bank needs to avail of the passporting system which allows banks to offer financial services in all countries in the EU without having to establish a permanent base in that member state.

The president of Morgan Stanley, Colm Kelleher, told Bloomberg two days ago that Brexit would be “the most consequential thing that we’ve ever seen since the war”.

Re: In, out or shake it all about?

Posted: 24 Jun 2016, 14:11
by duke63
The new £1 coin released today. :D
image.jpeg

Re: In, out or shake it all about?

Posted: 24 Jun 2016, 14:15
by Blade
Why is it in two pieces ? :?

Re: In, out or shake it all about?

Posted: 24 Jun 2016, 14:33
by Kwacky
Because it's two faced to represent UK politicians.

Re: In, out or shake it all about?

Posted: 24 Jun 2016, 15:03
by Rossgo
Kwacky wrote:
Rossgo wrote:
It's the media in my opinion mate. We talked about this at work. People have spun it around...why do the media want to make people angry? It was clearly meant for the money to go on other things not just NHS. He has done nothing wrong in my opinion in this situation.
If he didn't say it why did he apologise for it?
Because the horrible typical media woman carried on and on...dam I apologise to my girl for the things I haven't even done yet when she's like that hahahaha!!

Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk

Re: In, out or shake it all about?

Posted: 24 Jun 2016, 15:33
by Monty