CBR600RR no more

The news and your views about biking
User avatar
duke63
Posts: 15506
Joined: 22 Oct 2013, 07:34
Your Bike: Ducati 748/853 & Triumph Street Triple 765RS
Location: Staffordshire
Has thanked: 4182 times
Been thanked: 4133 times

Re: CBR600RR no more

Post by duke63 »

I doubt there is much if any difference in the manufacturing and development costs of a 600cc supersports bike and a 1000cc superbike yet the manufacturer can charge another £3-4k for a superbike.

From an economics point of view the 600s make no sense to the manufacturer.
User avatar
Cav
Posts: 7965
Joined: 27 Oct 2015, 12:00
Your Bike: 2009 ZX6R
Has thanked: 1050 times
Been thanked: 2206 times

Re: CBR600RR no more

Post by Cav »

Thing is Andy, modern day supersports make similar power to the original superbikes and are probably faster around a circuit so if you think about it, asking £11k isn't exactly uncalled for.

I agree though, I would not pay that myself
User avatar
Blade
Posts: 18772
Joined: 14 Mar 2014, 18:43
Your Bike: Kawasaki ZX10R
Location: North West
Has thanked: 3134 times
Been thanked: 3767 times

Re: CBR600RR no more

Post by Blade »

duke63 wrote:I doubt there is much if any difference in the manufacturing and development costs of a 600cc supersports bike and a 1000cc superbike yet the manufacturer can charge another £3-4k for a superbike.

From an economics point of view the 600s make no sense to the manufacturer.
I guess the difference is in the electronics and their development.

Just look at the R1 as an example, 6 axis inertia unit, race abs, power modes, launch control, traction control, slide control, quickshifter, down shifter not to mention magnesium wheels and alloy tank all of which are standard on the base model R1 but not even options on the R6.

If all thinks were equal the only difference would be engine internals which would be minimal cost difference. So all in you could argue the middleweight are better value for money I suppose.
Post Reply